Archive for July, 2009


For those of you new to the SEO world you can rest assured that if the sky has not fallen yet - it soon will, any second, maybe…this same drum has been beating for the past 5 years and every few months a new SEO Prophet has some newfangled reason for it to be the truth, THIS TIME!

Here is a posting from a forum on Feb. 2006

Is SEO dead?

I’ve heard many people that says SEO people usually make the site worser for google than it was before.  Is that true?

And another one from Sept. 2008

Is SEO dead?

I posted this another forum but wanted to get feedback from everyone here as well about a blog post I made this morning.

And now Justin Harrison is touting the same brimstone and hellfire silliness.  Here is a quote from his blog:
In fact my own research shows that 92% of all top ranked websites sites sampled are not only at risk, but have a 85% chance of completely loosing their rankings.

I hate to break the news to Justin but if the above really happens then Google will pretty much become irrelevant.  I am guessing he came to this conclusion based on something to do with folks breaking some or all of Googles rules but if they simply get rid of all their top ranking listings or even 50% of them, the result will be terrible.


Here is a bit of my expert research, getting rid of the top 10 or so results for some keywords and let’s see what is left:


Interestingly enough if we get rid of the first 12 results for the term ‘SEO is Dead’ we end up with what you see below…now I get it.  Good job Justin.
seo is really dead image

We Won a Google Top Knol Award

Author: SEO Company Geek
 
July 3, 2009

Top Pick Knol Award

A few weeks ago one of my Google Knols was chosen as a Top Pick Knol Award, Top 10 SEO Tips.

Google Knol Award Image


Optimization vs. Paid Search

Author: SEO Company Geek
 
July 1, 2009

In 2008 it is interesting to see that paid search efforts outspent organic optimization 10-1, my thoughts are that this will drastically change over the course of the next 5 years because many competitive industries are hitting extremely high costs on a pay-per-click basis and even though SEO can be harder to measure and can take a longer time to show results.  Those results are so impressive that they can mean the difference between ‘making-or-breaking’ a business.

I was recently involved in doing SEO for a company that had a cost per acquisition of $47 through traditional style advertising and that cost went down to $3.85 for those aquired though search engine optimization.

I find the biggest problem with SEO continuing to grow at the pace it deserves is twofold, first there is a lot of resistance from traditional marketing folks because SEO is a much different animal.  With SEO you are spending considerable resources on something your company ultimately has no control over, the search engines.  And to make matters even more complicated the search engines keep their algorithms and methods of ranking a secret.  Secondly, most business owners and traditional type marketing managers don’t really understand SEO and that makes it very difficult for them to justify the expense and risks involved in switching over their traffic acquisition methods to organic vs. paid.

search marketing 2008

But there is hope and I do see a pattern starting with the largest and most progressive companies as they give SEO a try.  It has even reached  a point where many of these companies are bringing SEO in-house where they can learn, track and enjoy these advantages up close and personal.