John Dvorak Stirs up the SEO Hornets Nest

Author: SEO Company Geek
 
January 5, 2010

John Dvorak over at pcmag.com wrote an article yesterday where he complained quite mightily about how SEO is ruining Google search results by:

“tricking Google or Bing or Yahoo into ranking your particular Web site higher than the competition by reverse-engineering the tricks used by Google, et al to rank sites in the first place.”

and

“It’s killing the Internet if it hasn’t already.”

and his proof of this is:

“Try and find the best cell phone deal on the Internet. Do it by using a search engine. Every hit is some commercial site trying to sell you something.”

So basically he typed in ‘best cell phone deal’ and he was upset that they results that came up were various websites that wanted to ‘actually’ sell him a cell phone. Ummm, ya….if you type in cell phone deals or some hybrid of that query you are likely in the market to ‘actually’ buy a cell phone, ergo the results that come up will be sites trying to do just that.

The real truth is that Google and other search engines encourage SEO as a way of putting your websites best foot forward and they don’t have any problem with this as long as you represent your website and its content in an honest way.  In fact here is a link to Googles SEO starter guide - which by-the-way is available in 40 languages due to its popularity.

After making the above wildly unresearched statements John continues to hoot-and-haw about how everyone is out to trick him but then he gives SEO a little free promo by stating:

“My advice to Web site managers, when you see this sort of result, is to contact THAT site and hire the consultant doing SEO for it. This sort of thing is no accident.”

Maybe he was just spouting off to attract readers but some of these comments, obviously made by search engine marketing folk got pretty nasty:

“I wonder if you have any understanding of business and marketing if you think commercial sites coming up when you are actually looking for a deal is a bad thing. That really made me laugh.”

“You’re right John, if I type in “best cell phone deal” I definitely don’t want to see sites offering me the ability to get good deals on cell phones. What I’m REALLY looking for would be a wikipedia article talking about the future of cell phones followed by a bunch of sites featuring cell phone news and tips on using cell phones to order pizza.”

Congratulations!! You have created the worst article that I have ever found on the internet.”

“John…seriously???? you just lost all credibility.”

“What a pity to read your post! What a pity for pcmag to let you write about SEO! I do recommend reading some basics SEO before you put up another post.”

“Which is worse? SEO, which you woefully misdescribe, or linking keywords in your article to adverts so that they pop up without warning in a really intrusive way?”

“John, a long long time ago, I respected your intelligence. Today, that’s completely gone.”

Ouch, I hope John does not take all this criticism too hard but I do agree - this article did seem quite ‘light’ on research.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.